Category Archives: Uncategorized

Hippocratic oath and the Nuremberg code -Every patient should be familiar with these

Fifty Years Later: The Significance of the Nuremberg Code

Evelyne Shuster, Ph.D.

N Engl J Med

The Nuremberg Codeimg_8866

1. The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential.

This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, overreaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision. This latter element requires that before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by the experimental subject there should be made known to him the nature, duration, and purpose of the experiment; the method and means by which it is to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonably to be expected; and the effects upon his health or person which may possibly come from his participation in the experiment.

The duty and responsibility for ascertaining the quality of the consent rests upon each individual who initiates, directs or engages in the experiment. It is a personal duty and responsibility which may not be delegated to another with impunity.

2. The experiment should be such as to yield fruitful results for the good of society, unprocurable by other methods or means of study, and not random and unnecessary in nature.

3. The experiment should be so designed and based on the results of animal experimentation and a knowledge of the natural history of the disease or other problem under study that the anticipated results will justify the performance of the experiment.

4. The experiment should be so conducted as to avoid all unnecessary physical and mental suffering and injury.

5. No experiment should be conducted where there is an a priori reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur; except, perhaps, in those experiments where the experimental physicians also serve as subjects.

6. The degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the humanitarian importance of the problem to be solved by the experiment.

7. Proper preparations should be made and adequate facilities provided to protect the experimental subject against even remote possibilities of injury, disability, or death.

8. The experiment should be conducted only by scientifically qualified persons. The highest degree of skill and care should be required through all stages of the experiment of those who conduct or engage in the experiment.

9. During the course of the experiment the human subject should be at liberty to bring the experiment to an end if he has reached the physical or mental state where continuation of the experiment seems to him to be impossible.

10. During the course of the experiment the scientist in charge must be prepared to terminate the experiment at any stage, if he has probable cause to believe, in the exercise of the good faith, superior skill, and careful judgment required of him, that a continuation of the experiment is likely to result in injury, disability, or death to the experimental subject.

The Nuremberg Code is the most important document in the history of the ethics of medical research.1-6 The Code was formulated 50 years ago, in August 1947, in Nuremberg, Germany, by American judges sitting in judgment of Nazi doctors accused of conducting murderous and torturous human experiments in the concentration camps (the so-called Doctors’ Trial).7 It served as a blueprint for today’s principles that ensure the rights of subjects in medical research. Because of its link with the horrors of World War II and the use of prisoners in Nazi concentration camps for medical experimentation, debate continues today about the authority of the Code, its applicability to modern medical research, and even its authorship.1,2,4,5,8 The chief prosecutor at the Doctors’ Trial, General Telford Taylor, believed that one of the three U.S. judges, Harold Sebring, was the author of the Code.2 Two American physicians who helped prosecute the Nazi doctors at Nuremberg, Leo Alexander and Andrew Ivy, have each been identified as the Code’s author.5,8-11 A careful reading of the transcript of the Doctors’ Trial, background documents, and the final judgment reveals that authorship was shared and that the famous 10 principles of the Code grew out of the trial itself.

In this article I will explain the important role that physicians had in the prosecution of the Nazi doctors and in the formulation of the Nuremberg Code and summarize how medical researchers have used the Code as a guide over the past five decades.

The Doctors’ Trial

The main trial at Nuremberg after World War II was conducted by the International Military Tribunal. The tribunal was made up of judges from the four allied powers (the United States, Britain, France, and the former Soviet Union) and was charged with trying Germany’s major war criminals. After this first-of-its-kind international trial, the United States conducted 12 additional trials of representative Nazis from various sectors of the Third Reich, including law, finance, ministry, and manufacturing, before American Military Tribunals, also at Nuremberg. The first of these trials, the Doctors’ Trial, involved 23 defendants, all but 3 of whom were physicians accused of murder and torture in the conduct of medical experiments on concentration-camp inmates.7

The indictment of the defendants was filed on October 25, 1946, 25 days after the conclusion of the first Nuremberg trial by the International Military Tribunal. The Doctors’ Trial began on December 9, 1946, and ended on July 19, 1947. The case was heard by three judges and one alternate. Thirty-two prosecution witnesses and 53 defense witnesses, including the 23 defendants, testified. A total of 1471 documents were introduced into the record. Sixteen of the 23 defendants were found guilty; 7 of them were sentenced to death by hanging, 5 to life imprisonment, 2 to imprisonment for 25 years, 1 to imprisonment for 15 years, and 1 to imprisonment for 10 years. Seven were acquitted. The sentences were confirmed by the military governor, and, after the U.S. Supreme Court declined to review the case, the executions were carried out at the Landsberg prison.

For the United States and its chief prosecutor, Telford Taylor, the trial was a murder trial (and murder had been identified by the International Military Tribunal as a crime against humanity). Nonetheless, as Taylor pointed out in his opening statement, this was “no mere murder trial,” because the defendants were physicians who had sworn to “do no harm” and to abide by the Hippocratic Oath.12 He told the judges that the people of the world needed to know “with conspicuous clarity” the ideas and motives that moved these doctors “to treat their fellow human beings as less than beasts,” and that “brought about such savageries” so that they could be “cut out and exposed before they become a spreading cancer in the breast of humanity.”12 One recurring theme was the relevance of Hippocratic ethics to human experimentation and whether Hippocratic moral ideals could be an exclusive guide to the ethics of research without risk to the human rights of subjects. In the trial’s exploration of ideas that shaped medical-research ethics, three physicians had central roles: Leo Alexander, an American neuropsychiatrist, Werner Leibbrand, a German psychiatrist and medical historian, and Andrew Ivy, a renowned American physiologist.

Leo Alexander

Leo Alexander, a Viennese-born American physician, had joined the U.S. Army Medical Corps in 1942, before being stationed in England at the American Eighth Air Force base. At the end of the war, Alexander was sent on a special mission under the Combined Intelligence Objectives Sub-Committee, an intelligence organization with members from several nations, and charged by orders from Supreme Headquarters of Allied Expeditionary Forces to gather evidence for the Nuremberg trials. Two days before the opening of the Doctors’ Trial, Alexander gave Taylor a memorandum entitled “Ethical and Non-Ethical Experimentation on Human Beings,” in which he identified three ethical, legal, and scientific requirements for the conduct of human experimentation.9 The first requirement established the right of the competent experimental subject to consent or refuse to participate in these terms: “the subject should be willing to undergo the experiment of his own free will. . . .” The second focused on the duty of physicians as expressed in the Hippocratic Oath, which Alexander restated in research terms: “the medical Hippocratic attitude prohibits an experiment if the foregone conclusion, probability or a priori reason to believe exists that death or disabling injury of the experimental subject will occur.” The third characterized good research practices.

On April 15, 1947, Alexander gave Taylor a second memorandum.9,11 In it he set forth in greater detail six specific conditions for ethically and legally permissible experiments on human beings. The first stated that

the legally valid voluntary consent of the experimental subject is essential. This requires specifically the absence of duress, sufficient disclosure on the part of the experimenter and sufficient understanding on the part of the experimental subject of the exact nature and consequences of the experiment for which he volunteers, to permit an enlightened consent.

The five other conditions established the humanitarian nature and purpose of the experiment and the scientific integrity and obligations of the investigator to the welfare of the subject.

Werner Leibbrand

On January 27, 1947, Werner Leibbrand, a German psychiatrist and medical historian at Erlangen University, opened the debate on medical ethics at Nuremberg.12 He explained to the court that German physicians at the beginning of the 20th century had adopted a “biologic thinking” according to which a patient was a series of biologic events, and nothing more than “a mere object, like a mail package.”12 Leibbrand insisted that such a view precluded any human relation between physicians and their patients and that it represented a perversion of Hippocratic ethics and “a lack of morality and reverence for human life.”12 He strongly condemned physicians who conducted experiments on subjects without their consent, and testified that this was also the result of biologic thinking.

During cross-examination, defense lawyers asserted that “civilized” nations such as France, the Netherlands, Britain, and the United States had performed dangerous medical experiments on prisoners, often without their consent. They cited American malaria experiments12-14 to argue that Nazi physicians had followed common research practices. Leibbrand replied that this American research also was wrong because “prisoners were in a forced situation and could not be volunteers.”12 Leibbrand insisted that “the morality of a physician is to hold back his natural research urge which may result in doing harm, in order to maintain his basic medical attitude that is laid down in the Oath of Hippocrates.”12 This strong accusation of American research by the prosecution’s first medical-ethics witness created major unanticipated problems for the prosecution. It therefore became necessary to broaden the scope of the trial by defining the conditions under which risky human experimentation is ethically permissible.

Defense lawyers explained that Nazi doctors were ordered by the state to conduct such experiments as the high-altitude, hypothermia, and seawater experiments on inmates at the Dachau concentration camp to determine how best to protect and treat German fliers and soldiers. They contended that these experiments were necessary and that the “good of the state” takes precedence over that of the individual.12 Leibbrand replied that “the state could order deadly experiments on human subjects, but the physicians remained responsible for [not] carrying them out.”12 Once these physiologic experiments became the centerpiece of the trial, reliance on psychiatrists alone was not possible. The prosecution needed a prestigious medical scientist who was an authority on research physiology and whose wartime scientific interests corresponded to those of the Nazi doctor defendants. This expert was Andrew Ivy.

Andrew Ivy

Andrew Ivy was an internationally known physiologist and a noted scientist. He also had first-hand knowledge of the Stateville Penitentiary experiments on malaria12,13 in his home state of Illinois, which the Nazi defendants attempted to liken to those performed on concentration-camp inmates. When the secretary of war, through the surgeon general of the army, asked the board of trustees of the American Medical Association to nominate a medical advisor to the Nuremberg prosecution, Ivy emerged as the natural nominee. On June 12, 1947, Ivy came to Nuremberg for the third time, this time to testify in rebuttal for the prosecution. His testimony, the longest of the trial, lasted four days.12

In direct examination, Ivy presented to the judges three research principles that he had formulated at the request of the American Medical Association and which, he said, reflected common research practices.12 His document entitled “Principles of Ethics Concerning Experimentation with Human Beings,” adopted by the American Medical Association House of Delegates in December 1946, read in part:

1. Consent of the human subject must be obtained. All subjects have been volunteers in the absence of coercion in any form. Before volunteering, subjects have been informed of the hazards, if any. Small rewards in various forms have been provided as a rule.

2. The experiment to be performed must be based on the results of animal experimentation and on a knowledge of the natural history of the disease under study, and must be so designed that the anticipated results will justify the performance of the experiment. The experiment must be such as to yield results for the good of society, unprocurable by other methods of study, and must not be random and unnecessary in nature.

3. The experiment must be conducted only by scientifically qualified persons and so as to avoid all unnecessary physical and mental suffering and injury and only after the results of adequate animal experimentation have eliminated any a priori reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur. . . .15

Ivy explained that these common-sense principles mirrored the understanding shared by everyone in practice in the medical community.12 The first principle was that a physician would never do anything to a patient or subject before obtaining his or her consent. Ivy also asserted that, unlike Leibbrand, he did not consider prisoners to be in an inherently coercive situation and thus unable to give consent, because in democratic countries where the rights of individuals are respected, prisoners can always say yes or no without fear of being punished.12 He testified:

The American malaria experiments with 800 or more prisoners were absolutely justified, scientifically, legally and ethically even if they bring with them danger to human life. To treat malaria was an important scientific problem, and so long as the subjects volunteer and are explained the hazards of the experiments, there is no ethical reason against it. . . . If prisoners condemned to death are volunteers, then it was ethical to do just that.12

During cross-examination, Ivy acknowledged that there were no written principles of research in the United States or elsewhere before December 1946 and that the principles adopted by the American Medical Association were expressly formulated for the Doctors’ Trial.12 Ivy also recognized that the right of the research subject to withdraw from an experiment may not always exist, as in the malaria experiments in which the subjects had already been infected, or in dangerous experiments in which the subjects could be severely injured or fatally harmed. Ivy agreed with Leibbrand that researchers must refuse to conduct experiments on human beings when ordered by the state in order “to save lives,” because in such cases subjects would not be volunteers. He declared that “[t]here is no justification in killing five people in order to save the lives of five hundred” and that “no state or politician under the sun could force [him] to perform a medical experiment which [he] thought was morally unjustified.”12 Ivy also stressed that the state may not assume the moral responsibility of physicians to their patients or research subjects, arguing that “[E]very physician should be acquainted with the Hippocratic Oath [which] represents the Golden Rule of the medical profession in the United States, and, to [his] knowledge, throughout the world.”12 When, finally, defense counsel asked Ivy to reconcile the Hippocratic moral maxim that forbids physicians to “administer a poison to anyone even when asked to do so” with conducting potentially lethal experimental interventions on volunteer subjects, Ivy replied, “I believe this Hippocratic commandment refers to the function of the physician as a therapist, not as an experimentalist, and what refers to the Hippocratic Oath is that he must have respect for life and the human rights of his experimental patient.”12

Medical Ethics and Human Rights

The judges at Nuremberg, although they realized the importance of Hippocratic ethics and the maxim primum non nocere, recognized that more was necessary to protect human research subjects. Accordingly, the judges articulated a sophisticated set of 10 research principles centered not on the physician but on the research subject. These principles, which we know as the Nuremberg Code, included a new, comprehensive, and absolute requirement of informed consent (principle 1), and a new right of the subject to withdraw from participation in an experiment (principle 9). The judges adopted much of the language proposed by Alexander and Ivy but were more emphatic about the necessity and attributes of the subject’s consent and explicitly added the subject’s right to withdraw.

In the traditional Hippocratic doctor–patient relationship, the patient is silent and dutifully obedient to the beneficent and trusted physician.16-18 Obviously, the patient must seek the physician’s help and initiate the therapeutic relationship with the physician.17 But once patients agree to be treated, they trust that the physician will act in their interest, or at least will do no harm.17,18 In research, which is outside the beneficent context of the physician–patient relationship, this trust may be misplaced, because the physician’s primary goal is not to treat; rather, it is to test a scientific hypothesis by following a protocol, regardless of the patient-subject’s best interest. It is therefore only through a conflation of treatment and research that Alexander and Ivy believed they could expand on Hippocratic ethics to protect the rights of subjects in human experimentation.19,20 Their Hippocratic view of medical research may have prevented them from adequately appreciating the risks to research subjects, which are many times greater than the risks to patients who are merely being treated.21 Hippocratic ethics, even when supplemented with informed consent, tend to submerge the subject’s autonomy into what the physician-investigator thinks is best for the subject.

Informed consent, the core of the Nuremberg Code, has rightly been viewed as the protection of subjects’ human rights. The key contribution of Nuremberg was to merge Hippocratic ethics and the protection of human rights into a single code. The Nuremberg Code not only requires that physician-researchers protect the best interests of their subjects (principles 2 through 8 and 10) but also proclaims that subjects can actively protect themselves as well (principles 1 and 9). Most strikingly, for example, in Hippocratic ethics the subject relies on the physician to determine when it is in the subject’s best interest to end his or her participation in an experiment. In the Nuremberg Code, the judges gave the subject as much authority as the physician-researcher to end the experiment before its conclusion (principle 9).

50 Years after Nuremberg

The Nuremberg Code has not been officially adopted in its entirety as law by any nation or as ethics by any major medical association. Nonetheless, its influence on global human-rights law and medical ethics has been profound.6 Its basic requirement of informed consent, for example, has been universally accepted and is articulated in international law in Article 7 of the United Nations International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (1966).6,22 Informed consent, with specific reliance on the Nuremberg Code, is also the basis of the International Ethical Guidelines for Biomedical Research Involving Human Subjects, the most recent guidelines promulgated by the World Health Organization and the Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences (1993).23

The World Medical Association, established during World War II, has been accused of purposely trying to undermine Nuremberg in order to distance physicians from Nazi medical crimes.24 The election of a former Nazi physician and SS member, Hans-Joachim Sewering, to the presidency of that organization in 1992 added credibility to that accusation.24 (Because of public criticism, Sewering later withdrew.) Nonetheless, the various versions of the Declaration of Helsinki promulgated by the World Medical Association since 1964, although attempting to have peer review supplement informed consent and even supplant it as their central principle in the context of “therapeutic research,” all implicitly acknowledge Nuremberg’s authority. Both the Nuremberg Code and the Declaration of Helsinki served as models for the current U.S. federal research regulations, which require not only the informed consent of the research subject (with proxy consent sometimes acceptable, as for young children), but also prior peer review of research protocols by a committee (the institutional review board of the hospital or research institution) that includes a representative of the community.25

The Nuremberg Code focuses on the human rights of research subjects, the Declaration of Helsinki focuses on the obligations of physician-investigators to research subjects, and the federal regulations emphasize the obligations of research institutions that receive federal funds. Nonetheless, by insisting that medical investigators alone cannot set the rules for the ethical conduct of research, even when guided by beneficence and Hippocratic ethics, and by adopting a human-rights perspective that acknowledges the centrality of informed consent and the right of the subject to withdraw, the Nuremberg Code has changed forever the way both physicians and the public view the proper conduct of medical research on human subjects. Fifty years after Nuremberg, we recognize the human-rights legacy of the Nuremberg Code and are better able to face the critical challenge of applying the Code in its entirety and enforcing its human-rights provisions.

Advertisements

Are you pregnant, a few warnings regards your fetus…….

We’ve come a long way since the perseverance and morality of Frances Kelsey. A long way… In the opposite direction. 
Read the excerpt below and then follow the links posted at the bottom of this post to find out if the FDA is still that vigorous about protecting pregnant women. 
Excerpt from article: 
“Marketed as a sedative for pregnant women, thalidomide was already available in Canada, Germany, and several African countries. It could have been a very simple approval. But for Kelsey, something didn’t sit right. There were no tests showing thalidomide was safe for human use, particularly during pregnancy.
“When Chemie Grünenthal released thalidomide in West Germany years earlier, they called it a “wonder drug” for pregnant women. They promised it would treat anxiety, insomnia, tension, and morning sickness and help pregnant women sleep. 

What they didn’t advertise were its side effects. 
“Because it crosses the placental barrier between fetus and mother, thalidomide causes devastating — often fatal — physical defects. During the five years it was on the market, an estimated 10,000 babies globally were born with thalidomide-caused defects. Only about 60% lived past their first birthday.”
Article:

http://www.upworthy.com/the-very-real-story-of-how-one-woman-prevented-a-national-tragedy-by-doing-her-job?c=sr1&sr_source=lift_facebook
Now, compare to what a pregnant woman today is recommended to ingest and inject: 
Pesticides (sprayed in the air, added to water, sprayed on food) also cross the placental barrier. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/19744971/
Mercury (thimerosal – vaccine preservative) crosses the placental barrier. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/22717874/
Aluminum (vaccine adjuvant) crosses the placental barrier. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3315392/pdf/nihms229599.pdf
TDaP (recommended for pregnant women today in the US) has not been studied in pregnant women. http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/rr5704a1.htm
The flu shot (recommended for pregnant women today in the US) has not been studied in pregnant women. https://www.gsksource.com/pharma/content/dam/GlaxoSmithKline/US/en/Prescribing_Information/Flulaval_Quadrivalent/pdf/FLULAVAL-QUADRIVALENT.PDF


Fluoride warnings

http://whale.to/a/research.html

 


Autism a direct connection to Vaccination 122 research papers

Syringe vacchttp://www.scribd.com/doc/220807175/122-Research-Papers-Supporting-the-Vaccine-Autism-Link#scribd

f9819-addautism


Polio-the hard core facts about the disease and the vaccine

Important FACTS about Polio mainstream media wont tell you-

(thanks to Dana for doing all the research)

There is a wild strain of Polio, and a Vaccine-Induced strain of Polio. The vaccine strain occurs when a baby gets a vaccine and the caregiver gets the virus from changing the diapers for up to 28 days. And, as I mentioned earlier in this long post — from excrement in their water supply.

The original (wild) strain of Polio was caused by DDT. Polio is not, and was never, a contagious disease… only the vaccine strain is contagious, and only via fecal matter. The original “strain” of Polio is not contagious, never was. PLEASE READ THE LINKS for more data……..

http://www.foodconsumer.org/…/polio_vaccine_causes…    Syringe vacc

http://www.whale.to/vaccines/polio.html

http://www.wellwithin1.com/pol_all.htm

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/…/ns/health-infectious_diseases

http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/91/2/119

http://www.gpo.gov/…/CHRG…/html/CHRG-108hhrg91047.htm

http://thejns.org/doi/abs/10.3171/jns.1984.61.4.0657

http://aje.oxfordjournals.org/…/abstract/150/10/1001

http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/…/122518940/abstract…

http://www.harpub.co.cc/

http://www.whale.to/a/nkuba.htm

http://www.irinnews.org/Report.aspx?ReportId=88935

http://www.infectiousdiseasenews.com/article/64255.aspx

http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE64D26A20100514…

http://arjournals.annualreviews.org/…/annurev.micro.58…

http://www.plosone.org/…/info:doi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal…

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL…

http://jvi.asm.org/cgi/content/full/78/9/4876

http://insidevaccines.com/…/polio-and-acute-flaccid…/

http://insidevaccines.com/wordpress/2010/05/26/polio-2010/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LZs1V8mpcoY

http://epirev.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/reprint/22/2/298.pdf

http://www.telegraphindia.com/…/story_15011108.jsp…

http://www.whale.to/a/nkuba

http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1489485377…

http://www.ageofautism.com/…/the-age-of-polio-how-an…

http://www.newswithviews.com/Tenpenny/sherri3.htm

http://vaccineresistancemovement.org/?p=4916

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3729856/

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22827246

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19428874/

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3122635/

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2937699/

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1762338/

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22591873

http://l.facebook.com/lsr.php…

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Twch-T-n8Ns

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q8M3HOqOAdU

http://www.cdc.gov/…/down…/appendices/G/cases-deaths.pdf

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iOwUkkE2A4c

Confirmed: India’s Polio Eradication Campaign in 2011 Caused 47,500 Cases of Vaccine-Induced Polio Paralysis
foodconsumer.org

CDC whistle blower the subject vaccines/autism

New Paper Reveals CDC Misconduct with Data Surrounding the MMR Vaccine and Autism

Scientific advisor to the Focus Autism Foundation, Dr. Brian Hooker, has obtained explosive information about ongoing malfeasance from a whistleblower for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).
Read rest of story here: http://focusautisminc.org/new-paper-reveals-cdc-misconduct-with-data-surrounding-the-mmr-vaccine-and-autism/
Read the full press release- or view Video clip of CDC Whistleblower Confesses to Vaccine-Autism Fraus http://focusautisminc.org/focus-autism-releases-findings-on-2003-cdc-autism-study-higher-autism-rate-among-african-american-boys-receiving-mmr-shot-earlier-than-36-months/

CDC Whistle Blower admits MMR Vaccine causes Autism

Published on Aug 20, 2014 Includes masked voice of whistleblower.
See Video here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q62DcaNs_0M Syringe vacc

Former CDC Head and Current Merck President Caught in Fraud Scandal

Posted August 25, 2014 | Atlanta, Georgia In the correspondence, dated February 2, 2004, Thompson refers to “statistical associations between the receipt of MMR vaccine and autism” and appeals to his boss to appropriately respond to a Congressman’s private allegations of impropriety within the agency’s National Immunization Program.
Read rest of story here: http://ireport.cnn.com/docs/DOC-1164827

Thompson, William (Bill) (CDC/ONDIEH/NBDDD)

[Natural News posts a JPEG graphic of a letter written by William Thompson October 18, 2002 to Melinda Wharton, Walt Orenstein, et al regarding DOJ Request in the matter of the MADDSP MMR/Autism Study.]
Read rest of story here: http://www.naturalnews.com/images/CDC-DOJ-Investigation-MMR-Vaccine-Autism-NN-Watermark.jpg

Whistleblower Says CDC Knowingly Put Children at Risk of Autism, Media Remains Silent (+Video)

August 26, 2014 “Oh my God, I did not believe that we did what we did, but we did. It’s all there… This is the lowest point in my career, that I went along with that paper. I have great shame now when I meet families of kids with autism, because I have been part of the problem.”—CDC Whistleblower Dr. William W. Thompson, in a recorded interview with Dr. Brian Hooker.
Read rest of story here: http://www.theepochtimes.com/n3/912252-whistleblower-reveals-cdc-knowingly-put-children-at-risk-of-autism-media-remains-silent/?photo=2

Our Story So Far: Both MMR & Mercury-Laced Vaccines Cause Autism

By Dan Olmsted August 28, 2014 Quite a week, I think you’d have to agree. William Thompson, the whistleblower first heard on a taped phone call with Brian Hooker last week, has now come forward, confirming his role in covering up evidence that black males may be particularly vulnerable to autism. Rather than follow up on that clue from a susceptibility group – a clue that could unravel the CDC’s whole argument that vaccines never, ever cause autism – the CDC researchers buried it.
Read rest of story here: http://www.ageofautism.com/2014/08/our-story-so-far-both-mmr-mercury-laced-vaccines-cause-autism.html

The CDC Whistleblower Press Release: Interpreted [LivingWhole.org]

August 28, 2014 by Megan Bobby Dee Interpretation: I’ve worked with these people for 16 years and they know all of my secrets, not that they’d ever threaten me with them. Not to mention that my pension doesn’t vest for another 4 years, so I’m going to try to keep this professional.
Read rest of story here: http://www.livingwhole.org/the-cdc-whistleblower-press-release-interpreted/

Whistleblower says CDC knew of vaccine autism link in 2003

August 29, 2014 [Vaccine Risk and Awareness Network] [Excellent summation and links to various sources.]
Read rest of story here: http://vran.org/in-the-news/whistleblower-says-cdc-knew-of-vaccine-autism-link-in-2003/

Dr. Andrew Wakefield breaks silence on #CDCWhistleblower

Published on Aug 28, 2014 [13 minutes 31 seconds: Vidio interview]
View Here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oPTxDzsVvyY

Erased by a Birth Certificate

In light of the recent events surrounding the CDC whistleblower. Have you seen the headlines screaming about the CDC vaccine researcher leaking documents that show the CDC knew in 2002 that the MMR vaccine was causing autism 3.36 times more often in African American toddlers who received it prior to the age of 3?
Yeah, me neither. Welcome to the media black-out.
[Insightful presentation of the Whistleblower story.]
Read rest of story here: erased-by-a-birth-certificate

When You Know You Are Being Lied To….

By Beth Clay August 27, 2014 When You Know You Are Being Lied To…My Initial Thoughts on the CDC Whistleblower News
While mainstream media have ignored the flurry the past two weeks after the Focus Autism Press Release, the Peer Reviewed Research paper by Brian Hooker, PhD, and the Autism Media Video, several online media outlets and social media have been a blaze with the news of a CDC employee reaching out to Dr. Hooker and coming clean about what I consider a well-orchestrated cover up of information about increased risks associated with vaccines. …

Read rest of story here: http://bethclay.com/

CDC and CIA: A Close and Sick Relationship

08/28/2014 VANCOUVER, BC – In a recent article entitled “CDC Ran the Tuskegee Experiment for 15 Years, Any Connection To Operation Paperclip?” http://exopolitics.blogs.com/ebolagate/2014/08/cdc-ran-the-tuskegee-experiment-for-15-years-.html a question was raised about the CDC and its possible connection to OSS/CIA’s importing Nazi scientists and doctors under Operation Paperclip.
Read rest of story here: http://exopolitics.blogs.com/ebolagate/2014/08/cdc-and-cia-a-close-and-sick-relationship.html

Want a little comic relief on this subject?

Secret bunker video from CDC captures moments after MMR vaccine confession

Published on Aug 29, 2014 Video
View this hilarious and insightful clip here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=30q7BxVw7dw
Alternate link https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qBfO9CDa81g
Another: http://childhealthsafety.wordpress.com/2014/09/03/deep-in-cdc-war-bunker-cdcs-fuhrer-orders-final-solution-overwhelmingly-superior-cdc-stormtroops-obliterate-dr-brian-hookers-paper/

Dear Pharmacist column: Were you lied to about vaccines and autism?

August 30, 2014 Many of you have wondered about the connection of vaccines and autism. The rising cases of autism worldwide have to be attributed to something, right? But many wonder if it’s related to vaccines, mercury, GMO foods or something else.
The biggest story in years broke when a leading researcher at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention helped uncover how they manipulated data and obscured a ridiculously higher incidence of autism. I mean ridiculous, upward of 340% higher incidence in autism, in the African-American boys who received the MMR vaccine. Dr. William Thompson came forward after a FOIA (Freedom of Information Act) was enacted. …
Read rest of story here: http://www.newsday.com/news/health/were-you-lied-to-about-vaccines-and-autism-1.9189436

National Vaccine Information Center Remove Vaccine Safety Oversight From DHHS

9/1/2014 On Aug. 27, 2014 a senior scientist at the Centers for Disease Control 1 publicly admitted 2 that he and other CDC officials, including the current CDC’s Director of Immunization Safety, 3 4 published a study about MMR vaccine safety in 2004 5 that “omitted statistically significant information” and “did not follow the final study protocol. “ He said the study “omitted relevant findings in a particular study for a particular sub group for a particular vaccine” and added that “there have always been recognized risks for vaccination” and “it is the responsibility for the CDC to properly convey [vaccine] risks.”
CDC: A History of Limiting Transparency
We couldn’t agree more. CDC officials should not be in the business of deliberately withholding information from the public about vaccine risks that may be greater for some children than other children. 6 Unfortunately, CDC officials have a long history of limiting transparency 7 8 and being less than honest with the American people about what it does and does not know about vaccine risks. 9 10 Last July, a RAND Corporation study commissioned and funded by DHHS was published proclaiming that vaccines “are very safe.” 11 What was not made clear to the public was that the study was designed and peer reviewed by high-level CDC officials, including the CDC’s Director of Immunization Safety. 12
This is a big problem for parents being ordered to give their children every government recommended vaccine – no exceptions and no questions asked.
Read rest of story here: http://www.nvic.org/NVIC-Vaccine-News/September-2014/Remove-Vaccine-Safety-Oversight-From-DHHS.aspx

BREAKING NEWS: CDC WHISTLEBLOWER TEXT MESSAGES TO ANDY WAKEFIELD: STUDY WOULD HAVE “SUPPORTED HIS SCIENTIFIC OPINION”

September 2, 2014 Dr. Wakefield shared two text messages with The Truth Barrier that he and his wife received from Dr. Thompson.
The first one was to Dr. Wakefield’s wife, Carmel, and it read:
I do believe your husbands career was unjustly damaged and this study would have supported his scientific opinion. Hopefully I can help repair it.
Read rest of story here: http://truthbarrier.com/2014/09/02/breaking-news-cdc-whistleblower-text-messages-to-andy-wakefield-study-would-have-supported-his-scientific-opinion/

Update: Congressman’s Office In Possession of 100,000 CDC Whistleblower Documents?

Sep 8, 2014 Congressman Bill Posey’s office has confirmed exclusively to Benswann.com that a “very large number” of documents have been turned over by CDC scientist, Dr. William Thompson, who has admitted that the CDC suppressed information about the links between the MMR vaccine and autism in some cases.
According to Congressman Posey’s spokesman, George Cecala, “I can confirm that we have received a very large number of documents and we are going through those documents now. There are a lot of them, so it will take some time.” Cecala could not say exactly how many documents are in possession of the Congressman’s staff though sources tell me that as many as 100,000 documents have been handed over.
Read rest of story here: http://benswann.com/update-congressmans-office-in-possession-of-100000-cdc-whistleblower-documents/

September 8, 2014 Autism in Black babies linked to MMR vaccines A senior scientist for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention claims the federal agency has been hiding results from a test of experimental measles vaccines that increased the likelihood of Black children getting autism, according to reports.
There has been a lot of controversy surrounding MMR (measles, mumps and rubella) vaccinations and whether or not they are linked to autism.
While the CDC assured the public that there was nothing to worry about with the vaccination, senior scientist Dr. William Thompson claims the CDC has been lying for years, according to The Examiner.
Dr. Brian Hooker was doing research for the Focus Autism Foundation and requested some information via the Freedom of Information Act about a 2004 study that claimed MMR vaccinations were perfectly safe.
According to Thompson, those results were false.
Read rest of story here: http://atlantablackstar.com/2014/09/08/cdc-scientists-shocking-confession-mmr-vaccine-likely-cause-autism-black-babies/

Posey looking at whistleblower’s CDC autism documents

September 9, 2014 U.S. Rep. Bill Posey has been curious for a while about whether there’s been enough research into alleged links between childhood immunizations and autism, and now his office has a cache of documents from a CDC scientist who said his research was tainted.
Posey’s Congressional office is reviewing somewhere in the neighborhood of 1,000 documents, including research statistics, it obtained from Dr. William Thompson, who has complained that the CDC withheld some of his data that may have suggested a link.
Posey, R-Rockledge, has maintained an interest in the issue since being briefed on it by former Space Coast Congressman U.S. Rep. Dave Weldon, who is a medical doctor.
Read rest of story here: http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/politics/political-pulse/os-us-rep-bill-posey-looking-at-immunizationautism-20140909,0,4774817.post

Questions Surrounding Review of Challenged Vaccine-Autism Study

September 10, 2014 Did the medical journal Pediatrics stand by a questioned vaccine-autism study without interviewing the coauthor who confessed to and exposed alleged scientific misconduct?
If so, that would deviate from what should be standard procedure in such an investigation, according to internationally recognized medical ethicist Dr. Michael Carome.
“If the evidence seems substantial, the journal should contact all co-authors, present them with the allegations and supporting evidence, and ask them to respond,” says Carome, a research ethics expert who heads the Health Research Group at the watchdog group Public Citizen.
Last month, William Thompson, a senior scientist at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) stepped forward to say that he and his CDC coauthors omitted key data showing a link between MMR vaccine and autism in African American children. The study was published in 2004 in the journal Pediatrics.
“I regret that my coauthors and I omitted statistically significant information,” said Thompson in a statement issued through his attorney August 27. “The omitted data suggested that African American males who received the MMR vaccine before age 36 months were at increased risk for autism. Decisions were made regarding which findings to report after the data were collected, and I believe that the final study protocol was not followed.”
It may be unprecedented for the author of a scientific, peer-reviewed article to publicly expose alleged flaws in his own work and that of his colleagues.
Read rest of story here: http://sharylattkisson.com/questions-surrounding-review-of-challenged-vaccine-autism-study

The CDC: A Truly Corrupt and Dangerous Organization

Christina England – September 10 2014 Over the years, the CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) has repeatedly deceived and lied to the public, yet they continue to state that their mission is to protect America from health, safety and security threats, both foreign and in the U.S.
They boldly announce on their website that the “CDC increases the health security of our nation. As the nation’s health protection agency, CDC saves lives and protects people from health threats. To accomplish our mission, CDC conducts critical science and provides health information that protects our nation against expensive and dangerous health threats, and responds when these arise,” and yet there is more and more evidence to suggest that their so called ‘scientific evidence’ has been skewed and deliberately tampered with to gain the desired results.
During the course of this article, I am going to give five recent examples of CDC fraud or deception. Each one of my examples will demonstrate when the CDC has deliberately altered or withheld scientific evidence in a bid to misinform the public.
Read rest of story here: http://vactruth.com/2014/09/10/cdc-corrupt-and-dangerous/?utm_source=The+Vaccine+Truth+Newsletter&utm_campaign=2eb78756b2-09_10_2014_cdc&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_ce7860ee83-2eb78756b2-408310285

Thailand Law Forum CDC Allegedly Covers Up Data Proving Vaccines Caused Autism

September 12, 2014 The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) allegedly covered up findings about a link between the MMR (measles, mumps, rubella) vaccine and autism, which senior scientist, William W. Thompson, unknowingly revealed in a recently recorded conversation, reports Sonoran News.
Read rest of story here: http://www.thailawforum.com/cdc-allegedly-covers-up-data-proving-vaccines-caused-autism/

Related News …

EPA-CDC Whistleblower exposes their corruption of science

July 12, 2014 Roger Landry, The Liberty Beacon.com Guest: EPA/CDC whistleblower Dr David Lewis, author of Science for Sale June 24, 2014
What follows is EASILY the most important discussion I have EVER had for The Liberty Beacon Special program. If this recorded discussion does not scare the hell out of you, make you insanely angry with good reason and fully awaken you to what many of us have long suspected … You need to check yourself for a pulse.
Dr. David Lewis is an internationally recognized research microbiologist whose work in public health and environmental issues as a senior-level Research Microbiologist in EPA’s Office of Research & Development, and member of the Graduate Faculty of the University of Georgia has been reported in numerous news articles and documentaries from Time Magazine and Reader’s Digest to National Geographic. He is the only EPA scientist to publish first-authored articles in Nature, Lancet, and Nature Medicine.
Dr. David Lewis worked with the EPA and CDC for 30 years plus. He explains in shocking detail why Americans have fallen from one of the healthiest to the sickest society on this planet in a few short generations, our health and that of our children literally sold out from under us for the proverbial 30 pieces of silver …
Read rest of story here: http://anticorruptionsociety.com/2014/07/12/epa-cdc-whistleblower-exposes-their-corruption-of-science/

Merck’s Motion to Dismiss Denied in Mumps Whistleblower Suits

September 6, 2014 A federal judge ruled on September 5, 2014, that two suits against pharmaceutical giant Merck have overcome motions to dismiss and will proceed to trial.
The first suit (1), filed in Pennsylvania in April of 2010 but sealed until June of 2012, was brought under the False Claims Act by two Merck virologists, Joan Wlochowski and Stephen Krahling.
The whistleblowers claimed to have witnessed Merck management instructing staff to withhold information about the high failure rate of the mumps portion of the MMR vaccine before selling it to the U.S. government. The manufacturer claimed the mumps vaccine had a 95% efficacy rate, even during epidemic mumps outbreaks of 2006 and 2009 in highly vaccinated populations. This rate was attained by basing efficacy tests on Merck’s own vaccine strain of mumps rather than wild mumps.
Read rest of story here: http://ireport.cnn.com/docs/DOC-1168282

CDC Whistleblower on Thimerosal in Pregnant Women

25 August 2014 [Video, click on link below]
Enjoy the video here: http://vimeo.com/104141199

More Revelations From CDC Whistleblower… This Time on Thimerasol in Vaccines For Pregnant Women…

August 27th, 2014 Opinion by Consumer Advocate Tim Bolen Things are coming to a head quickly in the Autism world.
Below is a link to a video with comments by Dr. William Thompson, a United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Whistleblower, on Thimerosal. Among his comments, in addition to the inappropriateness of routinely giving Thimerosal-containing vaccines to pregnant women, is that “There is biological plausibility to say right now that thimerosal causes autism-like features.”
It is one more video put out by my friends Andy Wakefield and Brian Hooker. This one is even shorter than the first one at one minute two seconds. It is titled “CDC Whistleblower on Thimerosal in Pregnant Women.” Go watch it now, please, and we’ll talk about it.
There are two very important points to consider: (1) The CDC, once again, knows very well how dangerous Thimerosal is in vaccines, and (2) The Whistleblower Dr. William Thompson, is an active participant in the problem solution, now, and is giving advice to Brian Hooker PhD on how to use the information
Read rest of story here: http://www.bolenreport.com/autism/More%20Revelations%20From%20CDC%20Whistleblower.htm

I Have Decided To Vaccinate My Child Because…

By Laura Hayes August 05, 2014 1. Because I want to believe that vaccines were responsible for eradicating the infectious diseases against which we vaccinate, even though data going back more than 150 years definitively show that vaccines were not responsible for the major drop in mortality from infectious diseases, or for the complete disappearance of horrible diseases for which there never was a vaccine (so how did those diseases go away, I’m wondering?), or for the increase in life expectancy. In actuality, mortality rates often increased after the initiation of mass vaccination programs. I want to believe it was the vaccines that were responsible, so I can have a false sense of security that my child will be protected from infectious diseases (at least the ones I’ve been taught to fear, i.e. the ones for which there is now a vaccine).
Read rest of story and 9 more good reasons to question vaccination, here: http://www.ageofautism.com/2014/08/i-have-decided-to-vaccinate-my-child-because.html

EPA-CDC Whistleblower exposes their corruption of science

June 24, 2014 Dr. David Lewis worked with the EPA and CDC for 30 years plus. He explains in shocking detail why Americans have fallen from one of the healthiest to the sickest society on this planet in a few short generations, our health and that of our children literally sold out from under us for the proverbial 30 pieces of silver
Read rest of story here: http://anticorruptionsociety.com/2014/07/12/epa-cdc-whistleblower-exposes-their-corruption-of-science/

A legislative effort in 2006 to split vaccine promotion and vaccine safety– Lawmakers sever ties between CDC and Big Pharma

August 21, 2006, In the wake of overhauling the FDA, lawmakers are also cracking down on conflicts of interest within the Centers for Disease Control.
Last month, Representatives, Dr Dave Weldon (R-FL), and Carolyn Maloney (D-NY), held a press conference to announce the introduction of a bill that would give responsibility for vaccine safety to an independent agency within the Department of Health and Human Services, and remove most vaccine safety research from the CDC.
Read rest of story here: http://www.lawyersandsettlements.com/articles/drugs-medical/CDC_Big_Pharma-00285.html

CDC: Deadly experiment on the Black and Hispanic populations (Measles Hi titer vaccine)

The CDC and World Health Organization (WHO) have a history of violating the human rights of Black families by unethically experimenting on their babies with dangerous measles vaccines.
Excerpt 1) new measles vaccine on “high-titer” shots that are up to 500 times more potent than standard measles vaccines.(11) In the early 1980s, they tested one of these — the Edmonston-Zagreb (EZ-HT) strain — on Mexican and Gambian babies 4 to 6 months old.(12-15) During the next few years this high-titer measles vaccine was also tested on babies in Guinea-Bissau, Togo, Senegal, Haiti, and impoverished minority communities in Los Angeles, California.(16-22)
Excerpt 2) Children who received the Schwartz strain (SW-HT) died of other diseases at a rate 51% higher than children who received a standard vaccine. There were 48 excess deaths for every 1000 babies vaccinated. Children who received the Edmonston-Zagreb strain (EZ-HT) died of other diseases at a rate 80% higher than children who received a standard vaccine. There were 75 excess deaths for every 1000 babies vaccinated.(17) Mortality remained consistently high in the second and third year after the EZ-HT vaccine was administered, whereas it declined substantially in the control group. One of every six babies vaccinated with EZ-HT died within three years.(17)
Read rest of story here: http://vaccineliberationarmy.com/2014/09/04/cdc-deadly-experiment-black-hispanic-populations-measles-hi-titer-vaccine/
More of this article: http://www.ageofautism.com/2014/09/minority-report-a-covert-cdc-program-inoculated-black-babies-with-deadly-experimental-measles-vaccines.html

Vaccination Liberation – Idaho Chapter Contact: Vaccination Liberation

“Free Your Mind….From The Vaccine Paradigm”


Medical Tyranny…… What is it?

The Financial Seeds of Medical Tyranny

Prior to the early twentieth century, thriving empirical medical practices, herbal and homeopathic, were more popular than allopathic medicine, which at that time specialized in surgery. This changed as influential individuals secured a spot on the financial empire.

The Carnegie, Morgan, and Rockefeller financial conglomeration at the turn of the 20th Century was the impetus toward total power over the medical field. Soon after their initial thrusts, it was the Rockefeller Institute that ensured the growth of this monopoly. After all, it was John D. Rockefeller who was quoted as saying, “Competition is a sin.”

Even the newly formed antitrust laws of the early 20th Century could not deter John D. from figuring out how to get around those restrictions with his oil business. One could say Rockefeller was the Godfather of antitrust law chicanery by playing shell games with his industries and retaining his monopoly.

The early centerpiece of his empire was oil. But early on, JD Rockefeller was aware of expanding his financial empire through the burgeoning pharmaceutical industry. His intention was to control the whole medical field, using the only remedies allowed, patented synthetic drugs.

Natural remedies can’t be patented, and patents bring big profits.

So John D. started by donating to medical schools, beginning with the University of Chicago’s School of Medicine. The stipulations were that only pharmaceutical based medicine would be taught. Then he hired Abraham Flexner to tour medical schools of other traditions throughout the nation “evaluating” the treatments they taught.

From that came the 1906 Flexner Report, which was sufficient to persuade lawmakers into creating legislation that would license only physicians trained in patented chemical based pharmacology and surgery.

Meanwhile, John D. Rockefeller recruited JP Morgan and Dale Carnegie as partners for buying a controlling share of the German drug cartel I.G. Farben. The AMA had been in existence since 1847 as an allopathic physician’s union. It came into prominence as a ruling medical non-government agency from 1920 on, with exclusive power over granting and revoking medical licensing.

The AMA would ridicule other non-synthetic drug medical practices as “quackery” and ensure those practitioners were driven out of business. After all, competition is a sin, J.D. Rockefeller once quipped. Ironically, it’s reported that during this time, the Rockefeller family used homeopathy for their medical needs.1b2f8e3304264470db768911418e4e83

Read more: http://naturalsociety.com/what-the-term-medical-mafia-means/#ixzz3X1fXQGcd
Follow us: @naturalsociety on Twitter | NaturalSociety on Facebook


Vaccine data important for all parents

Legislation:  ”VACCINE FREE 2015” due to 1) Ingredients, 2) Diseases, 3) Intent

thanks to Sallie Elkordy for this data

1) TOXIC INGREDIENTS FOUND IN VACCINES: * aluminum hydroxide * aluminum phosphate * ammonium sulfate *amphotericin B * animal tissues: pig blood, horse blood, rabbit brain * dog kidney, monkey kidney* chick embryo, chicken egg, duck egg * calf (bovine) serum * betapropiolactone * fetal bovine serum * formaldehyde * formalin *gelatin *glycerol * human diploid cells (originating from human aborted fetal tissue)* hydrolized gelatin * mercury thimerosol (thimerosal, Merthiolate) *monosodium glutamate (MSG) * neomycin * neomycin sulfate *phenol red indicator* phenoxyethanol (antifreeze) * potassiumdiphosphate * potassium monophosphate* polymyxin B * polysorbate 20 *polysorbate 80 porcine (pig) pancreatichydrolysate of casein * residual MRC5 proteins * sorbitol *tri(n)butylphosphate * VERO cells, a continuous line of monkey kidney cells *washed sheep red blood (source, The Physicians Warrantee of Vaccine Safety) and the ANTHRAX Vaccine (BioEthics Commission concluded meetings regarding testing this vaccine on Children 1/15/13)

2) DISEASES FROM VACCINES:* Allergies * Asthma * Attention Deficit Disorder *Autism * Auto-immune Diseases * Blindness * Brain Cell Loss *Cancer * Central Nervous System Damage* Deafness * Developmental Damage *DEATH * Diabetes * Epilepsy * Learning Disabilities * Leukemia * Multiple Sclerosis * Neurological Disease * Organ Disease * Psoriasis * Seizures * Shaken Baby Syndrome * Synergistic Toxicity *SIDS * Total Paralysis * All Diseases in Internal Medicine

3-A) INTENT: “The Vaccine Hoax is Over” by Andrew Baker http://nsnbc.me/2013/05/10/the-vaccine-hoax-is-over-freedom-of-information-act-documents-from-uk-reveal-30-years-of-coverup/

“Freedom of Information Act in the UK filed by a doctor there has revealed 30 years of secret official documents showing that government experts have

1. Known the vaccines don’t work

2. Known they cause the diseases they are supposed to prevent

3. Known they are a hazard to children

4. Colluded to lie to the public

5. Worked to prevent safety studies

Those are the same vaccines that are mandated to children in the US.”

Dr. Lucija Tomljenovic’s full paper can be downloaded here on pdf format: http://nsnbc.me/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/BSEM-2011.pdf

3-B) INTENT:  The World Health Organization: commentary by Dr. Rebecca Carley, “1972 WHO Vaccine Memos which reveal nefarious intent: http://www.infowars.com/who-memos-1972-explains-how-to-turn-vaccines-into-a-means-of-killing/print

1972 WHO Bulletin 47, No 2Memorandas #1 and #2 Virus-associated immunopathology: Animal models and implications for human disease * technically outline the ability to create biological weapons in the form of vaccines that:

1) First totally disable the Immune System.

2) Load every cell of the Victim’s body up with Infection.

3) Switch the Immune System on causing the host to kill themselves in a Cytokine Storm.

~ One, Two, Three, Dead.  This is a crucial piece of evidence of WHO’s long-term genocidal intentions that could stand in any court of law because these memorandums give the best and fullest explanation of WHO’s affiliated labs (such as the CDC’s) current activities, such as their patenting of the most lethal bird flu viruses, sending that virus to Baxter’s subsidiary in Austria, which weaponized it and sent out 72 kilos to 16 labs in four countries almost triggering a global pandemic.

~ For every crime, there needs to be motive, an indication that it was deliberate, planned. The WHO memorandums provide the evidence of just that deliberate, long-term planning to kill people by weakening their immune system by use of the first vaccine, injecting a live virus into their body by a second, and creating a cytokine storm using squalene in a third.”

~ The cover-up of these vaccine-induced epidemics is aiding and abetting crimes against humanity.”

3-C) INTENT/COVER-UP: “At Last!  Government Documents Locked Up for 30 Years Proving this Vaccine Unsafe (measles) Finally Revealed” http://vactruth.com/2012/08/30/government-document-vaccine-unsafe

3-D) INTENT/COVER-UP: “Deadly Immunity” by Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. http://www.thinktwice.com/Kennedy.pdf

IMPORTANT:

~ The USA’s Infant Mortality Rate (IMR) is the highest of 34 Countries.  The USA injects children with the greatest number of vaccination doses.  The country with the lowest IMR gives the fewest vaccine doses to infants. The correlation between the number of doses of vaccines and the death rate of infants is thus apparent as mentioned by Representative Bill Posey at the Autism Hearing in November of 2012:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6zGqUfvFDI4

~ “Disease Rates of Vaccinated vs. Unvaccinated” (vaccinated children have up to 5 times the rate  of diseases and disorders as unvaccinated children) http://alignlife.com/articles/immunity/disease-rates-of-vaccinated-vs-unvaccinated-children/

~ Violating The Nuremberg Code: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuremberg_Code

~ Most of the evidence against vaccination has been suppressed by the mainstream media, but is both voluminous and available because Parents of Vaccine Injured and Dead Children have created a multitude of educational forums such as: http://Educate4TheInjured.orghttp://VacLib.org and http://BillionToddlerMarchForSurvival.blogspot.com  as well as Professionals http://www.VaccinationCouncil.org and http://NoVaccine.com (this site provides each vaccine by type and manufacturer, with the list of INGREDIENTS & ADVERSE REACTIONS).f7415-vaccine-child-300x196


%d bloggers like this: