Breast cancer propaganda
You won’t hear this in the U.S., because the media is practically owned by Big Pharma these days, but nearly all cancer is preventable. Even the World Health Organization says that 70 percent of all cancers can be prevented. I believe the real number is closer to 90 percent.
So where is the cancer industry on prevention? Where are the education programs, nutritional programs and support of vitamin D or herbal products that provably halt the growth of cancer tumors? They’re nowhere to be found. The cancer industry isn’t interested in preventing breast cancer, you see, which is why the entire subject of serious prevention is almost universally ignored in the United States.
Breast cancer is simply too profitable to prevent. If they taught women how to avoid the disease, they’d lose up to 90 percent of their revenues.
The American Cancer Society actively scares women away from breast cancer prevention strategies such as sunlight therapy
You may have seen them in magazines like WIRED — full-page ads sponsored by the American Cancer Society, scaring people away from sunlight exposure by telling them sunlight causes skin cancer.
In fact, as new research is now showing, sunlight prevents cancer, and those women with the most sunlight exposure (as long as it’s not over-exposure) have remarkably lower rates of breast cancer. So why is the ACS telling people to avoid sunlight, anyway?
Read more articles on sunlight exposure.
The technology used to detect breast cancer actually causes breast cancer
Mammograms emit radiation and directly cause DNA damage to breast tissue. False positives are common and almost always lead to aggressive cancer treatments that harm perfectly healthy women.
The push for breast cancer screening is a brilliant ploy by the cancer industry, however: Since each screening actually causes cancer, women who get screened with enough frequency will almost inevitably develop breast cancer, at which point the cancer doctors will say, “Good thing we caught it early, huh?”
“Miracle” breast cancer drugs like Herceptin are practically worthless
Even Dr. Ralph W. Moss — a cancer expert from the world of conventional medicine who — couldn’t resist pointing out the hype surrounding Herceptin. He’s published numerous articles questioning the Herceptin hype, and authored his own report called Herceptin – Or Deceptin?.
In an article written for New Scientist magazine, Dr. Moss explains that Herceptin is practically useless for most women, and that the drug only prevented breast cancer for 0.6 percent of women in one trial. Yes, that’s less than one out of a hundred. And yet Herceptin is widely heralded as a “miracle drug” by ignorant doctors, consumers and politicians.
See my cartoon, Herceptin House of Mirrors for a cartoon on this topic.
“Breast cancer has been transformed into a market-driven industry. It has become more about making money for corporate sponsors than funding innovative ways to treat breast cancer.” – Health Studies researcher Samantha King, author of Pink Ribbons Inc.
Wearing pink for breast cancer, or buying pink products, is a demonstration of your support for the enslavement of women by a highly-unethical industry that seeks to turn women’s bodies into profit centers. Wearing pink shouts, “I support the ignorance of women! I support Big Pharma! I support male-dominated corporate control over the health of women’s breasts!”
Buying pink products sends the same message. Whether it’s a can of soup, a pair of pink batteries or even a pink “vacation” (yes, they do exist), these products are jumping on the pink bandwagon for one reason only: consumers buy it. Painting any product pink results in a sales surge.
The marketing push for pink products is so strong now that many companies selling products that actually cause cancer have jumped on the pink bandwagon! It’s a practice called “pinkwashing,” and when you see things like toxic cosmetics and chemically-manufactured personal care products sporting the pink ribbons and pledging to support breast cancer research, you have to stop and ask yourself the obvious question: Don’t these products actually CAUSE breast cancer? Yes, many of them do.
The truth is there’s no accountability in the donations stemming from the sales of such pink products. Buying a can of soup branded with a pink ribbon, for example, may generate a whole of two cents in donations. And where do those donations go? Are they spent on nutritional education programs for women? Of course not – they often go into the pockets of pro-pharmaceutical non-profit groups (like the Susan G. Komen Breast Cancer Foundation) that have very strong ties to drug companies and actually receive much of their funding from those companies. In effect, these are drug company “front groups” that engage in disease mongering and push mass screening in order to multiply the number of people being “treated” for breast cancer. The only allowed treatments, of course, are those that financially benefit the drug companies and conventional medicine practitioners.
The solution? Think before you pink! See the website of the honest non-profit, Breast Cancer Action, at www.ThinkBeforeYouPink.org to learn more.
Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/Report_Breast_Cancer_Deception_12.html#ixzz4Lx9blDklBreast Cancer Deception
Source: Breast Cancer Deception page 0