Headaches and homeopathic remedies

 

The Homeopathic Treatment of Headaches, Migraine

There are literally hundreds of homeopathic remedies that can be used in the treatment of headaches and migraines, and a qualified and registered homeopath will seek to match the sufferer with a remedy that will work for the individual. Homeopathic remedies work by stimulating the body’s own healing mechanisms. The following are just a few relevant remedy descriptions taken from “The Desktop Companion to Physical Pathology” by Roger Morrison, MD.

Nat Mur. The main remedy for migraines and headaches in general. Bursting pain. Sensation of small hammer in one spot. Vise. Favours right side. As headache stops on one side it comes on the opposite side. Worse morning, on waking; from grief; in sun, heat, during menses. Better cold applications, perspiration, for pressure, closing eyes; must lie down in dark room. Visual disturbances and vomiting from headache.

Belladonna. Excellent remedy for both acute and chronic headaches and migraines. Intense pain, throbbing, exploding, maddening; pressing outward sensation ‘as if eyes will pop’; pain comes and go suddenly, or start slowly and end suddenly. Right sided. Worse night, going down steps, coughing, sneezing, shaking head, motion; light, sun, heat. Better lying in dark, quiet room, cold applications, closing eyes; hard external pressure, sitting up in bed. Bounding pulse in head; sharp pain with each throb. Vomiting with headache; eyes bloodshot; hands and feet icy.remedykit4

Sanguinaria. Congestive migraine headaches.Right side starts should or neck radiates to right forehead, eye. Throbbing, burning.. Worse: daytime, light, noise, odours, jarring, Better: for sleep, after vomiting, passing wind; pressing head against something hard. Vomiting with headaches. With indigestion, burning in stomach. Flushed face.

Iris Versicolor. Classic migraine. Begins with visual aura and ends with vomiting. Spots before eyes, shimmering, blurry vision. Weekly, especially at weekends.Right sided. Worse in cold air, sitting or resting; relaxing after study, for cough. Better; in open air, standing, walking, constant gnetle motion. Blindness or blurry vision with headache.

Spigella. Severe migraine headache. Left forehead above left eye. Pain extends back into head. Stitching or neuralgic pain. Violent pain. Usually in one spot. Worse, morning, comes and goes with sun; for motion, jarring; for cough, pressing at stool, for touch, stooping, standing; for cold or open air; for wind, smoke, noise. Better for heat or hot bathing; keeping eyes closed; lying down, with head elevated. Headache associated with palpitations or other heart problems.

Bryonia. Chronic migraine headache, acute fevers. Pain beings over left eye, extends to whole head, sometimes to shoulders and back. Dull heavy pains, stitching pains. Increases slowly with heaviness congestion, fullness. Worse: morning on rising, slightest motion, jarring, for cough, exertion, for ascending steps; when constipated; for heat, sun, eating, for walking. Better for pressure, lying on painful side; in dark; washing in cold water; for cool air. Nausea or vertigo on attempting to sit up.

Lachesis. Congestive headache with pulsation, fullness and pressing outward. Left side or forehead; begins on left side,  moves to right. Frontal headache extending to nose. Bursting sensation, as if brain will burst or eyes will pop out. Worse morning on waking; heat; sleep; tight collars; anger; excitement; menses. Better for pressure, cold air and cold applications; for menstruation, and all discharges; for vomiting. Headache associated with hypertension.

Sepia.Headaches associated with nausea; sick headache; periodic coming in waves or sometimes sudden shocks. Left forehead and above left eye. Worse, for menses, pregnancy, menopause; for light, mental exhaustion, stuffy room, motion sickness. Better for open air, vomiting, eating, sleeping; lying in dark; vigorous exertion; for pressure. Empty sensation in stomach during headache.

Glonoinum. Intense pounding headache as if the head would burst. Face flushed and pulse bounds in carotids. Pain increases and decreases with the sun’s rise and fall. Worse, sun and heat. Menopause or before menses; jarring, motion, tight collars. Better for pressure, lying in dark room, cold applications or cold washing; bending head forward; betting into shade. Faintness during congestive headache.

Calc Carb. Chronic headaches and migraines from stress and over-worry. Worse for cold, damp; getting head wet; mental exertion; for light, menses, exertion, ascending, lifting heavy weights, shaking head, stooping. Better for pressure or binding the head

Gelsenium. Severe and exhausting headache. Heaviness in head, especially in forehead, with droopy eyelids; can scarcely hold head erect or eyes open. Headache alternating with abdominal pains.. Hammering in head; maddening headache; dull, stupid headache. Worse 10am, 2am; for wine; lying flat; motion of head; exertion; mental exertion. Better, for urination, for vomiting; lying or reclining with head elevated. Pupils dilated, cold feet and cold perspiration during headache. Weakness, prostration and trembling during headache.

Phosphorus. Migraine headaches with burning or pulsing pains. Headache every other day. Worse for fasting, lying on left side; for hot food or drinks; menses, light, mental exertion, before storms, sneezing, motion. Better after sleeping, eating running; for cold air or cold applications. Markedly hungry during headache.

Silica. Chronic headache and migraines. Start top of head and extends for forehead or eye. Headache with chronic sinusitis above root of nose. Worse for cold, or drafts; for light, jarring, noise, fasting, exertion, mental exertion. Continuous daily headache. Better for covering head; warm applications, for pressure, after urination. Clammy sweat on forehead during headache.

Ignatia. Migraine headaches, especially after grief and sorrow. Headache associated with back or neck spasms. Pains increase gradually and cease suddenly. Pain as if from nail, especially on side of head. Worse for emotions, grief, anger, fright; studying or concentration; for odours, smoke and fumes; for light; for stooping; for straining at stool. Better for lying on painful side; for alcohol, for warm applications. Empty sensation in stomach with headache.

Ipecacuanha. Headache with severe nausea and vomiting. Sensation as if  head or skull brised. Worse standing. Better Open air.

Kali Bich. Blindness before headache. Sight returns as headache increases. Headache in small specific spots. Wandering pain. Worse, exactly same hour each day. Lying on painful side; cold wet weather; with sinusitis.

Mag Phos. Migraines and facial neuralgia, often on right side. Headache extending into face. Worse, cold. Better, hard pressure.

 

RANDOMISED CONTROLLED TESTS (RCTS)

RCTs are the third, and decidedly the least important type of evidence supporting Homeopathy as a medical therapy.

Homeopathic Treatment of Migraine in Children: Results of a Prospective, Multicenter, Observational Study. The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine. February 2013, 19(2): 119-123. doi:10.1089/acm.2011.0821.

Conclusion. “The results of this study demonstrate the interest of homeopathic medicines for the prevention and treatment of migraine attacks in children. A significant decrease in the frequency, severity, and duration of migraine attacks was observed and, consequently, reduced absenteeism from school”.

Homeopathic treatment of migraine: a double blind, placebo controlled trial of 68 patients.
Straumsheim P, Borchgrevink C, Mowinckel P, Kierulf H, Hafslund O
British Homeopathic Journal, 89:4–7. 2000

“The neurologists’ trial evaluation showed a statistically significant reduction in attack frequency in the homeopathy group (P= 0.04) and non-statistically significant trends in favour of homeopathy for pain intensity and overall evaluation”.

Double-blind randomized placebo-controlled study of homoeopathic prophylaxis of migraine.
Whitmarsh TE, Coleston-Shields DM, Steiner TJ
Cephalalgia,17:600–604. 1997

Homoeopathic treatment of migraines: a randomized double-blind study of sixty cases (homoeopathic remedy versus placebo).
Brigo B, Serpelloni G .
Berlin Journal on Research in Homeopathy, 1:98–106. 1991

“An analysis of the homoeopathically-treated patients demonstrates a significant reduction in the periodicity, frequency, and duration of migraine attacks”.

This article was first published in the “Why Homeopathy?” website.

Posted by Steve Scrutton

Advertisements

How to win any vaccine debate – part 1

Source: How to win any vaccine debate – part 1


5 chemical pushers claiming to help you get well

Five kinds of chemical pushing hucksters who know good and well prescription drugs make health matters worse
#1. Addiction psychiatrists – these are medical doctors who mainly prescribe SSRIs (selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors) for people with addictions to alcohol, illegal drugs or other experimental prescription medications. Pharmacological “strategies” are used by psychiatrists to target individuals suffering from anxiety or attention deficit disorders due to substance abuse. Could anxiety and depression also stem from chemical-laced foods? Of course it can, but is there even one addiction psychiatrist in America who tests their patient’s blood or urine for poisoning from insecticides and herbicides? Instead of searching for the root cause, many addiction psychiatrists sling experimental, dangerous mind-altering drugs like Prozac, Zoloft and Paxil on tens of millions of Americans, including children and teens, because it’s easy money. Evidence continues to accumulate that these drugs induce suicidal and murderous actions, not to mention strokes for women after menopause.chemo
#2. Pediatricians and adolescent medicine specialists – Ever heard of “Dollars for Docs?” Pharmaceutical and medical device companies are now required by law to release details of their payments to all kinds of U.S. doctors that push pills on infants, children and teens (over $6 billion every three years). Why are there no payments to doctors to promote organic foods and natural remedies?
#3. Oncologists (including radiation oncologists) – Did you know chemotherapy can backfire and cause healthy cells to feed the growth of cancer tumors? So why then do oncologists use chemo as a mainstream method of treating a cell disorder that’s mainly caused by the consumption of chemicals? It doesn’t make sense.
#4. Dermatologists – Most dermatologists perform surgery as a standard function for treating cancer “spots” on the skin, but cancer is a disorder of the cells, with a deeper-rooted cause. Would you go around your yard chopping off the tops of weeds and expecting them to stop growing? It doesn’t make sense.
#5. Surgeons – Should surgeons keep removing the malfunctioning organs of Americans who eat all the wrong foods daily? Is this cost effective and wise? Maybe every surgeon, radiologist, pediatrician and oncologist in America needs to go back to college and study nutrition, then reassess their fundamental approach to medicine.bigpharma


Vaccine Damage Compensation

All #vaccinesharm -Below is a selection of recent decisions of the United States Court of Federal Claims awarding compensation to vaccine-injured clients of Maglio Christopher & Toale, P.A. through the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program. Click on the case number to view the official decision document from the United States Court of Federal Claims. The decisions usually include a brief summary of the case and lists the dollar amount of awarded damages. The names of our clients have been redacted to protect their privacy.
Our attorneys have recovered more than $200 million dollars for vaccine injured clients over the past 3 years.
In fact, we obtained the highest single compensation award in Vaccine Act history for one of our clients.
READ ABOUT OUR $61 MILLION DOLLAR VACCINE INJURY SETTLEMENT
READ ABOUT OUR $14 MILLION DOLLAR LIFETIME VACCINE INJURY SETTLEMENT
Client Compensation for Vaccine Injuriesvaccine3
Search:
Date
Vaccine Name
Illness
or Symptoms
Link to Court Decision
Amount Compensated
5/6/2017
HPV Vaccine
Neuromyelitis Optica
Case12-630V
$11.5 Million Over Lifetime
4/6/2017
Influenza Vaccine
Neurologic Injuries, CIDP
Case14-642V
$337,000
4/5/2017
Influenza Vaccine
Guillain Barre Syndrome (GBS)
Case13-1018V
$800,000
3/27/2017
Hepatitis B Vaccine
Demyelinating Polyneuropathy
Case13-430V
$300,000
3/20/2017
Influenza Vaccine
Transverse Myelitis
Case15-525V
$370,000
3/15/2017
Flu Vaccine
Complex Regional Pain Syndrome
Case 13-594V
$526,000
3/13/2017
Influenza Vaccine
Optic Neuritis, Vision Loss
Case 15-1329V
$175,000
3/9/2017
Tdap Vaccine
Guillain Barre Syndrome (GBS)
Case 15-1130V
$345,000
3/9/2017
DTaP, Meningococcal Vaccines
CIDP
Case 15-1247V
$146,000
2/9/2017
DTaP, Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccines
Transverse Myelitis
Case 15-1100V
$233,000
1/31/2017
Influenza Vaccine
Parsonage Turner Syndrome
Case 14-1209V
$80,000
1/17/2017
Influenza Vaccine
Encephalitis
Case 09-878V
$520,000
1/6/2017
Flu Vaccine
SIRVA
Case 16-0696V
$115,000
1/4/2017
Flu Vaccine
SIRVA
Case 16-320V
$97,500
12/19/2016
Influenza Vaccine
Acute Hemorrhagic Leukoencephalomyelitis (AHLE)
Case 12-403V
$1.7 Million
12/16/2016
Influenza Vaccine
Guillain Barre Syndrome (GBS)
Case 15-0526V
$180,000
12/12/2016
Influenza Vaccine
SIRVA
Case 15-1508V
$50,000
12/12/2016
Influenza Vaccine
SIRVA
Case 16-0924V
$126,000
12/9/2016
Flu, Tdap Vaccines
Guillain Barre Syndrome (GBS)
Case 16-0339V
$86,000
12/9/2016
Influenza Vaccine
SIRVA
Case 16-0573
$170,000
11/30/2016
Tetanus Vaccine
Brachial Neuritis
Case 9-530V/a>
$1.64 Million
11/29/2016
Influenza Vaccine
Guillain Barre Syndrome (GBS)
Case 15-1289V
$218,000 plus $6,000/yr annuity
11/29/2016
MMR
Hearing Loss, Tinnitus
Case 15-1328V
$25,000
11/26/2016
Influenza Vaccine
Guillain Barre Syndrome (GBS)
Case 15-1031V
$100,000
11/18/2016
Flu Vaccine
Guillain Barre Syndrome (GBS)
Case 15-0366V
$100,000
11/17/2016
Influenza Vaccine
Guillain Barre Syndrome (GBS)
Case 16-48V
$111,000
11/16/2016
Influenza Vaccine
Guillain Barre Syndrome (GBS)
Case 15-1228V
$135,000
11/15/2016
Influenza Vaccine
Guillain Barre Syndrome (GBS)
Case 15-273V
$600,000
11/14/2016
Influenza Vaccine
Guillain Barre Syndrome (GBS)
Case 16-495V
$169,000
11/10/2016
Tdap Vaccine
Guillain Barre Syndrome (GBS)
Case 15-568V
$155,000
10/28/2016
Influenza Vaccine
Transverse Myelitis
Case 15-1370V
$130,000
10/25/2016
Influenza Vaccine
SIRVA
Case 16-0913V
$115,000
10/20/2016
Influenza Vaccine
Guillain Barre Syndrome (GBS)
Case 13-930V
$800,000
10/19/2016
Influenza Vaccine
Guillain Barre Syndrome (GBS)
Case 14-969V
$420,000 plus $3,550/mo annuity
10/14/2016
Influenza Vaccine
Guillain Barre Syndrome (GBS)
Case 15-1231V
$175,000
10/13/2016
Flu Vaccine
Neurologic Injuries
Case 15-0274V
$67,500
10/11/2016
Influenza Vaccine
GBS, CIDP
Case 13-781V
$1.38 Million
9/30/2016
Flu Vaccine
Guillain Barre Syndrome (GBS)
Case 15-928V
$280,000
9/26/2016
Influenza Vaccine
Guillain Barre Syndrome (GBS)
Case 15-940V
$235,000
9/26/2016
Influenza Vaccine
SIRVA
Case 16-770V
$100,000
9/21/2016
Influenza Vaccine
Complex Regional Pain Syndrome
Case 15-1190V
$157,000
9/20/2016
Tetanus Vaccine
SIRVA
Case 15-1262V
$50,000
9/20/2016
Influenza Vaccine
SIRVA
Case 15-1430V
$165,000
9/13/2016
Influenza Vaccine
Death, GBS
Case 15-65
$360,000
9/12/2016
Influenza Vaccine
GBS, CIDP
Case 15-864V
$218,368
9/12/2016
Influenza Vaccine
Guillain Barre Syndrome (GBS)
Case 15-1257V
$140,000
9/9/2016
Influenza Vaccine
SIRVA
Case 15-1400V
$100,000
9/6/2016
Influenza Vaccine
SIRVA
Case 16-214V
$120,000
8/30/2016
Influenza Vaccine
Neuritis, Myositis, Polyneuropathy
Case 15-1317V
$200,000
8/29/2016
Influenza Vaccine
Lumbosacral Raduculoplexus Neuropathy (LSRPN)
Case 12-405V
$130,000
8/29/2016
DTaP, Rotavirus, Pneumonia Vaccines
Intussusception, Surgical Intervention
Case 15-1196V
$100,000
8/26/2016
Influenza Vaccine
SIRVA
Case 15-1551V
$115,000
8/19/2016
Flu Vaccine
SIRVA
Case 16-438V
$115,000
8/18/2016
Influenza Vaccine
SIRVA
Case 15-1340V
$82,500
8/15/2016
Influenza Vaccine
Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS)
Case 15-934V
$104,000
8/15/2016
Influenza Vaccine
Optic Neuritis
Case 15-1319V
$100,000
8/12/2016
Influenza Vaccine
Guillain Barre Syndrome (GBS)
Case 16-172V
$150,000
8/9/2016
Influenza Vaccine
SIRVA
Case 16-366V
$97,500
8/5/2016
Tdap Vaccine
SIRVA- Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Administration
Case 16-14V
$101,494
8/5/2016
Flu Vaccine
SIRVA- Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Administration
Case 16-040V
$150,844
8/4/2016
Influenza Vaccine
Transverse Myelitis
Case 15-956V
$210,000
8/2/2016
Influenza Vaccine
Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS)
Case 15-1235V
$85,087
8/2/2016
Flu Vaccine, Tdap
Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS)
Case 15-1272V
$340,000
8/2/2016
Influenza Vaccine
SIRVA- Shoulder Injury Resulting from Vaccine Administration
Case 15-1320V
$76,000
7/28/2016
Influenza Vaccine
GBS
Case 15-661V
$200,000
7/18/2016
Influenza Vaccine
Transverse Myelitis
Case 15-219V
$300,000
7/17/2016
Tdap Vaccine
GBS, CIDP
Case 13-337V
$400,000
7/13/2016
Flu Vaccine/Death
Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS)
Case 15-0514V
$525,000
7/13/2016
Influenza Vaccine
Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS)
Case15-1051V
$209,407
7/11/2016
Influenza Vaccine
Acute Disseminated Encephalomyelitis
Case 14-482V
$75,000
7/8/2016
Hepatitis A & B, Twinrix
SIRVA- Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Administration
Case 16-0112V
$60,000
6/29/2016
Flu Vaccine
SIRVA- Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Administration
Case 15-1215V
$111,462
6/28/2016
Flu, Dtap Vaccine
Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS)
Case 15-0728V
$190,000
6/28/2016
Flu Vaccine
SIRVA- Shoulder Injury Resulting from Vaccine Administration
Case 15-1227V
$126,365
6/23/2016
Hepatitis B Vaccine
Brachial Neuritis
Case 14-041V
$85,000
6/20/2016
Influenza Vaccine
CIDP
Case 14-545V
$300,000
6/20/2016
Tdap Vaccine
Transverse Myelitis
Case 14-923V
$220,000
6/16/2016
Influenza Vaccine, Tdap
Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS)
Case 15-983V
$175,000
6/13/2016
Influenza Vaccine
Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS)
Case 15-893V
$75,000
6/9/2016
Influenza Vaccine
Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS)
Case 15-1067V
$315,000
5/31/2016
Gardasil, FluMist
Multiple Sclerosis
Case 12-630V
$250,000
5/18/2016
Influenza Vaccine
Spinal Cord Myelitis
Case 15-800V
$70,000
5/18/2016
Influenza Vaccine
Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS)
Case 15-1124V
$132,443
5/17/2016
Flu Vaccine, Menactra Vaccine
Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS)
Case 15-1123V
$75,000
5/13/2016
Influenza Vaccine
Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS)
Case 14-912V
$315,000
5/13/2016
Influenza Vaccine
Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS)
Case 14-912V
$315,000
5/12/2016
Flu Vaccine
Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS)
Case 15-1500V
$148,359
5/6/2016
Influenza Vaccine
Guillain-Barre Syndrome, Encephalopathy
Case 14-302V
$200,000
4/29/2016
Flu Vaccine
SIRVA- Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Administration
Case 15-730V
$118,000
4/28/2016
Influenza Vaccine
SIRVA- Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Administration
Case 15-1129V
$130,439
4/27/2016
Flu Vaccine
SIRVA- Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Administration
Case 15-350V
$130,990
4/27/2016
Influenza Vaccine
SIRVA- Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Administration
Case 15-1350V
$130,990
4/27/2016
Tdap Vaccine
SIRVA- Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Administration
Case 15-1369V
$25,000
4/25/2016
Influenza Vaccine
SIRVA- Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Administration
Case 15-1487V
$85,000
4/19/2016
Flu Vaccine
SIRVA- Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Administration
Case 15-313V
$141,624
4/7/2016
Flu Vaccine
Transverse Myelitis
Case 15-1162V
$70,000
4/6/2016
Influenza Vaccine
Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS)
Case 15-0921V
$112,000
3/29/2016
Influenza Vaccine
SIRVA- Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Administration
Case 15-1138V
$103,722
3/24/2016
Influenza Vaccine
GBS
Case 14-1089V
$289,861
3/21/2016
Flu Vaccine
Parsonage Turner Syndrome
Case 15-276V
$80,000
Showing 1 to 100 of 481 entries
PreviousNext (many pages of cases via the direct link) vaccdoses2017
Case results depend upon a variety of factors unique to each case and do not guarantee or predict a similar result in any future case.
No part of the financial award to the client is collected by our law firm.
There is never a contingency fee in vaccine cases in the United States Court of Federal Claims.
Our clients keep 100% of their listed settlements because our legal fees are paid directly by the Court.

these brave lawyers will fight for your children contact link ; Mctlawyers.com (vacc-injury cases


Breastcancer charity Conflicts of interest

October -More Red Flags, Conflicts of Interest, and Fundraising Fraud- (#SusanGkomen)
In 2011, Komen created a perfume called “Promise Me.” It contained unsafe chemicals that were deemed toxic and hazardous with negative health effects.img_8988 The ingredients included galaxolide, an endocrine disruptor, touluene, a possible carcinogen and toxic to the liver, and coumarin, which is toxic to the liver and kidneys and used to kill rodents.
In 2012, Komen partnered with the Coca Cola Company promoting FUZE tea. With 31 grams of sugar, high fructose corn syrup (likely genetically modified), sucralose, and preservatives. Is this a beverage that should be promoted alongside claims to be researching for “the cure” for breast cancer?
In 2013, Yoplait (the yogurt company) held a campaign called “Save Lids to Save Lives.” They donated 10 cents per lid with a special code which consumers could redeem. Yet hormone-laden dairy, sugar, and artificial chemicals have all been linked to cancer.
How can an organization that claims to be focused on preventing and curing breast cancer partner with companies that sell highly processed fast food, junk food, artificial food, hormone-filled dairy products, and sugar/chemical-laden food and beverages that have had a strong correlation with contributing to cancer? Many of these “pseudo foods” and products are known contributors to cancer causation or progression. Do you think these partnerships are actually contributing to a cure or are they really creating more customers for the cancer industry?
#SusanGKomen

Downplays Well Known Hazards of Environmental Toxins and Chemicals
Komen’s website seems to also have the gall to downplay or even deny any possible breast cancer link between well-known and obvious environmental toxins. This includes BPA – an endocrine disruptor that mimics estrogen, found in products such as plastics, liners of canned food and even toilet paper; phthalates – another hormone disruptor found in personal care and cleaning products; and parabens – a preservative found in cosmetics that acts like a weak estrogen. All of these chemicals increase the risk for hormone-driven cancers. Watchdogs have pointed out that Komen receives generous donations from companies who use BPA in their products (Coca-Cola, General Mills, 3M, to name a few).
Komen also supports fracking for gas and oil. Fracking is a process which entails mixing water with chemicals, such as the carcinogens formaldehyde and benzene, and pumping the mixture underground to breakup rock formations, thus polluting groundwater. Komen even went so far as to promote pink drill bits to be used for fracking.
Are Komen’s Messages about Mammograms Misleading?
Not only does Komen partner with products and companies that contribute to cancer, they have exaggerated the benefits of mammograms with catchy slogans such as “early detection saves lives.” Women have been bombarded with this message for far too many years. Few people questioned the almighty annual mammogram. It was always heavily promoted as the “gold standard” for early detection and women who did not get a mammogram were equated with being irresponsible.
Unfortunately, numerous studies have shown that mammography has not lived up to its hope and promise. The reality is that mammograms only save one life in 2,000 while they harm 8-10 women through false alarms, missed cancers, and unnecessary surgery, radiation, drugs, stress, and anxiety!
“Over-diagnosis” (red flagging cancers that would have been eliminated by the body through natural processes, never to become problematic) has become rampant since the widespread use of mammography. Millions of women have now been found to have had needless “cancer” treatments and many have died because of these. Further, while more “cancers” are being found at an early stage, studies have shown no reduction in the number of women dying of breast cancer in the last 30 years.
Breast cancer experts, major newspapers, and long-time proponents of mammography are now either questioning it or speaking out against annual screening programs stating they are doing more harm than good. Yet, despite all the studies and expert warnings, Komen continues on with the same message proclaiming “early detection saves lives”, urging women to get mammograms. The Komen website states, “Despite some ongoing debate, mammography is still the most effective screening tool used today for the early detection of breast cancer.”
Suspicious Ties to Drug Companies and Mammography Machine Makers
The pharmaceutical company AstraZeneca is the maker of the drug tamoxifen. According to “Pink Ribbon Culture,” AstraZeneca gave $97,000 to Komen affiliates in 2008. They have been known to have a very large presence at Komen “race for the cure” events and they have been a major force in Breast Cancer Awareness Month. Incidentally, tamoxifen is listed as a carcinogen by the World Health Organization as it increases the risk of uterine and other cancers. Komen promotes the use of tamoxifen.
General Electric (GE), one of the largest makers of mammogram machines, is listed on Komen’s website as a “Promise Circle” Partner – donating the highest amount – $1 million plus annually. In 2012, Komen and GE partnered to bring free mammograms to women in rural areas as well as uninsured women through a mobile mammography van called a “Mammovan.”
Pink-Infused Profits – Where Does All the Money Go?
A quick check of Komen’s tax returns posted on Charity Navigator (a service that evaluates and rates public charities for accountability and transparency) may come as a shock. Founder and CEO Nancy Brinker’s salary was $560,896 in 2013. And in 2012, Komen’s President was paid $606,461.
With a multi-million dollar budget and high profile PR campaigns, Komen has  been immensely successful at engaging millions of women to sign up for their annual “races for the cure.” In order to participate in Komen’s popular “three day walk” events, each participant must personally raise over $2,000 for Komen.
Charity Navigator reports that Komen’s annual revenue is well over $200 million. Besides enormous executive salaries, a large percent of this money goes to “education” and “awareness” campaigns. This awareness then leads to fueling the push for more mammograms.
The Missing Truth About Breast Cancer Prevention
In all of Komen’s campaigns, where is the information about the root causes of cancer (such as environmental toxins) and risk reduction or prevention through nutrition and lifestyle? Instead of promoting and offering free mammograms to underserved and low-income women, maybe Komen could give a sliver of attention and funding directly to women for free naturopathic health-care, organic food, stress reduction, nutritional counselling, immune system building, and healthy cooking classes. The problem is these known breast cancer risk-reducers are missing one key element – profitability for Komen! And so the status quo continues and pinkwashing will prevail, unless you help us spread the word far and wide.


Vaccination visual chart

for more info http://www.thinktwice.com

vaccdoses2017vaccautismvaccabortedcellsvaccine3vaccingr2mercury


The state of research in Homeopathy


TETANUS VACCINES, SPONTANEOUS ABORTIONS, & Population Control. ThinkTwice!

 

Were Tetanus Vaccines
Laced with Birth-Control Drugs?

Learn About Tetanus

more on this data http://www.thinktwice.com

During the early 1990s, the World Health Organization (WHO) had been overseeing massive vaccination campaigns against tetanus in a number of countries, among them Nicaragua, Mexico, and the Philippines. In October 1994, HLI received a communication from its Mexican affiliate, the Comite’ Pro Vida de Mexico, regarding that country’s anti-tetanus campaign. Suspicious of the campaign protocols, the Comite’ obtained several vials of the vaccine and had them analyzed by chemists. Some of the vials were found to contain human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG), a naturally occurring hormone essential for maintaining a pregnancy.
hCG and Anti-hCG Antibodies
In nature the hCG hormone alerts the woman’s body that she is pregnant and causes the release of other hormones to prepare the uterine lining for the implantation of the fertilized egg. The rapid rise in hCG levels after conception makes it an excellent marker for confirmation of pregnancy: when a woman takes a pregnancy test she is not tested for the pregnancy itself, but for the elevated presence of hCG.
However, when introduced into the body coupled with a tetanus toxoid carrier, antibodies will be formed not only against tetanus but also against hCG. In this case the body fails to recognize hCG as a friend and will produce anti-hCG antibodies. The antibodies will attack subsequent pregnancies by killing the hCG which naturally sustains a pregnancy; when a woman has sufficient anti-hCG antibodies in her system, she is rendered incapable of maintaining a pregnancy.(1)
HLI reported the sketchy facts regarding the Mexican tetanus vaccines to its World Council members and affiliates in more than 60 countries.(2) Soon additional reports of vaccines laced with hCG hormones began to drift in from the Philippines, where more than 3.4 million women were recently vaccinated. Similar reports came from Nicaragua, which had conducted its own vaccination campaign in 1993.
The Known Factsblogphoto14
Here are the known facts concerning the tetanus vaccination campaigns in Mexico and the Philippines:
* Only women are vaccinated, and only the women between the ages of 15 and 45. (In Nicaragua the age range was 12-49.) But aren’t men at least as likely as young women to come into contact with tetanus? And what of the children? Why are they excluded?
* Human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG) hormone has been found in the vaccines. It does not belong there — in the parlance of the O.J. Simpson murder trial, the vaccine has been “contaminated.”
* The vaccination protocols call for multiple injections — three within three months and a total of five altogether. But, since tetanus vaccinations provide protection for ten years or more, why are multiple inoculations called for?(3)
* WHO has been actively involved for more than 20 years in the development of an anti-fertility vaccine utilizing hCG tied to tetanus toxoid as a carrier — the exact same coupling as has been found in the Mexican-Philippine-Nicaragua vaccines.(4)
The Anti-Fertility Gang
Allied with the WHO in the development of an anti-fertility vaccine (AFV) using hCG with tetanus and other carriers have been UNFPA, the UN Development Programme (UNDP), the World Bank, the Population Council, the Rockefeller Foundation, the All India Institute of Medical Sciences, and a number of universities, including Uppsala, Helsinki, and Ohio State.(5) The U.S. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (part of NIH) was the supplier of the hCG hormone in some of the AFV experiments.(6)
The WHO begain its “Special Programme” in human reproduction in 1972, and by 1993 had spent more than $356 million on “reproductive health” research.(7) It is this “Programme” which has pioneered the development of the abortificant vaccine. Over $90 million of this Programme’s funds were contributed by Sweden; Great Britain donated more than $52 million, while Norway, Denmark and Germany kicked in for $41 million , $27 million, and $12 million, respectively. The U.S., thanks to the cut-off of such funding during the Reagan-Bush administrations, has contributed “only” $5.7 million, including a new payment in 1993 by the Clinton administration of $2.5 million. Other major contibutors to the WHO Programme include UNFPA, $61 million; the World Bank, $15.5 million; the Rockefeller Foundation, $2.5 million; the Ford Foundation, over $1 million; and the IDRC (International Research and Development Centre of Canada), $716.5 thousand.
WHO and Philippine Health Department Excuses
When the first reports surfaced in the Philippines of tetanus toxoid vaccine being laced with hCG hormones, the WHO and the Philippine Department of Health (DOH) immediately denied that the vaccine contained hCG. Confronted with the results of laboratory tests which detected its presence in three of the four vials of tetanus toxoid examined, the WHO and DOH scoffed at the evidence coming from “right-to-life and Catholic” sources. Four new vials of the tetanus vaccine were submitted by DOH to St. Luke’s (Lutheran) Medical Center in Manila — and all four vials tested positive for hCG!
From outright denial the stories now shifted to the allegedly “insignificant” quantity of the hCG present; the volume of hCG present is insufficient to produce anti-hCG antibodies.
But new tests designed to detect the presence of hCG antibodies in the blood sera of women vaccinated with the tetauns toxoid vaccine were undertaken by Philippine pro-life and Catholic groups. Of thirty women tested subsequent to receiving tetanus toxoid vaccine, twenty-six tested positive for high levels of anti-hCG! If there were no hCG in the vaccine, or if it were present in only “insignificant” quantities, why were the vaccinated women found to be harboring anti-hCG antibodies? The WHO and the DOH had no answers.
New arguments surfaced: hCG’s apparent presence in the vaccine was due to “false positives” resulting from the particular substances mixed in the vaccine or in the chemicals testing for hCG. And even if hCG was really there, its presence derived from the manufacturing process.
But the finding of hCG antibodies in the blood sera of vaccinated women obviated the need to get bogged down in such debates. It was no longer necessary to argue about what may or may not have been the cause of the hCG presence, when one now had the effect of the hCG. There is no known way for the vaccinated women to have hCG antibodies in their blood unless hCG had been artificially introduced into their bodies!
Why A Tetanus Toxoid “Carrier”?
Because the human body does not attack its own naturally occurring hormone hCG, the body has to be fooled into treating hCG as an invading enemy in order to develop a successful anti-fertility vaccine utilizing hCG antibodies. A paper delivered at the 4th International Congress of Reproductive Immunology (Kiel, West Germany, 26-29 July 1989) spelled it out: “Linkage to a carrier was done to overcome the immunological tolerance to hCG.”(8)
Vaccine Untested by Drug Bureau
After the vaccine controversy had reached a fever pitch, a new bombshell exploded; none of the three different brands of tetanus vaccine being used had ever been licensed for sale and distribution or registered with the Philippine Bureau of Food and Drugs (BFAD), as required by law. The head of the BFAD lamely explained that the companies distributing these brands “did not apply for registration.”(9) The companies in question are Connaught Laboratories Ltd. and Intervex, both from Canada, and CSL Laboratories from Australia.
It seemed that the BFAD might belatedly require re-testing, but the idea was quickly rejected when the Secretary of Health declared that, since the vaccines had been certified by the WHO — there they are again! — there was assurance enough that the “vaccines come from reputable manufacturers.”(10)
Just how “reputable” one of the manufacturers might be is open to some question. In the mid-`80s Connaught Laboratories was found to be knowingly distributing vials of AIDS-contaminated blood products.(11)
Epilogue
At this juncture, evidence is beginning to appear from Africa.(12) HLI has called for a Congressional investigation of the situation, inasmuch as nearly every agency involved in the development of an anti-fertility vaccine is funded, at least in part, with U.S. monies.

 

NOTES:
(1) “Abortifacient vaccines loom as new threat,” HLI Reports, November 1993, pp. 1-2.
(2) World Council Reports, 28 November 1994, pp. 4-5.
(3) A call placed by this writer on 5 May 1995 to the Montgomery County (Maryland) Health Department, Epidemology Division — Infectious Diseases — Adult Immunizations, elicited the following information:
Q. For how long a time does the tetanus vaccination offer protection?
A. 10 years.
Q. Have you ever heard of any adult requiring three tetanus vaccinations within a 3 or 4 month time period, and a total of 5 vaccinations in all within a year or so?
A. Whaaaat! Never. No way!
Reports from the Philippines appear to confirm the 10-year immunity afforded by tetanus toxoid vaccinations: prior to the campaigns begun in 1993, the so-called booster shots were given only every 10 years.
(4) More than a score of articles, many written by WHO researchers, document WHO’s attempts to create an anti-fertility vaccine utilizing tetanus toxoid as a carrier. Some leading articles include:
“Clinical profile and Toxicology Studies on Four Women Immunized with Pr-B-hCG-TT,” Contraception, February, 1976, pp. 253-268.
“Observations on the antigenicity and clinical effects of a candidate antipregnancy vaccine: B-subunit of human chorionic gonadotropin linked to tetanus toxoid,” Fertility and Sterility, October 1980, pp. 328-335.
“Phase 1 Clinical Trials of a World Health Organisation Birth Control Vaccine,” The Lancet, 11 June 1988, pp. 1295-1298. “Vaccines for Fertility Regulation,” Chapter 11, pp. 177-198, Research in Human Reproduction, Biennial Report (1986-1987), WHO Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (WHO, Geneva 1988).
“Anti-hCG Vaccines are in Clinical Trials,” Scandinavian Journal of Immunology, Vol. 36, 1992, pp. 123-126.
(5) These institutional names are garnered from the journal articles cited in the previous footnote.
(6) Lancet, 11 June 1988, p. 1296.
(7) Challenges in Reproductive Health Research, Biennial Report 1992-1993, World Health Organization, Geneva, 1994, p. 186.
(8) G.P. Talwar, et al, “Prospects of an anti-hCG vaccine inducing antibodies of high affinity…(etc),” Reproductive Technology 1989, Elsevier Science Publishers, 1990, Amsterdam, New York, p. 231.
(9) “3 DOH vaccines untested by BFAD,” The Philippine Star, 4 April 1995, pp. 1, 12.
(10) “BFAD junks re-testing of controversial shot,” Manila Standard, 7 April 1995; “DOH: Toxoid vaccines are safe,” The Philippine Star, 7 April 1995.
(11) “Ottawa got blood tainted by HIV.” Ottawa Citizen, 4 April 1995.
(12) A nearly two-year old communique from Tanzania tells a familiar story: tetanus toxoid vaccinations, five in all, given only to women aged 15-45. Nigeria, too, may have been victimized; see The Lancet, 4 June 1988, p. 1273.
Credit: Copyright June/July 1995 by James A. Miller, special correspondent for Human Life International. This article was originally published in HLI Reports, Human Life International, Gaithersburg, Maryland; June/July 1995, Volume 13, Number 8. Permission to reprint granted to Thinktwice/New Atlantean Press.


%d bloggers like this: